Montgomery Blair Sibley, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| No. 11-1185 Title: Montgomery Blair Sibley, Petitioner v. United States District Court for the District of Columbia Docketed: March 29, 2012 Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Case Nos.: (12-5040) Decision Date: March 6, 2012 ~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Mar 28 2012 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 30, 2012) Mar 28 2012 Motion to expedite consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari filed by petitioner. Apr 4 2012 Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 20, 2012. Apr 23 2012 Motion to expedite consideration filed by... |
Dictator Obama Issues New Threat to Supreme Court over ObamaCare
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| In his latest display of his full USA federal government dictatorship over both the American people and the former co-branches of government, Dictator Obama is warning the Supreme Court to either rule in his favor or face severe consequences. Fox News’ Martha McCallum advised Thursday that the Obama Administration has been quietly sending missives to the Supreme Court threatening that if it doesn’t rule in his favor on ObamaCare, Medicare will face disruption and “chaos.” Therefore, if SCOTUS rules in favor of the US Constitution, Obama & Co will begin its campaign to either destroy Medicare or make those on... |
ObamaCare is DEAD MEAT
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| Better it than you! As has been said here and at finer places where patriots dwell, ObamaCare MUST be destroyed... now my friends the United States Supreme Court is about to do precisely that on this oh-so-very-blessed day. Of course I'm not the only one saying it: Rasmussen found that a majority of American voters are confident ObamaCare will be overturned, and though not yet a done deal, it is extremely doubtful that Anthony Kennedy has flipped, and that's just what blindered Obammunist members of the court (Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan) need to assist them in ramming this unconstitutional, budget-bloating power grab through the nation's... |
Newsweek Calls For Impeaching Supreme Court Justices If Obamacare Overturned
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| NewsWeek/DailyBeast – The Roberts Court’s rulings appear to be a concerted effort to send us back to the Gilded Age. If they dump the Affordable Care Act, writes David Dow, we should dump them. You think the idea is laughable? Thomas Jefferson disagreed with you. Jefferson believed Supreme Court justices who undermine the principles of the Constitution ought to be impeached, and that wasn’t just idle talk. During his presidency, Jefferson led the effort to oust Justice Salmon Chase, arguing that Chase was improperly seizing power. The Senate acquitted Chase in 1805, and no Justice has been impeached since, but... |
Obama says he will ‘respect’ Supreme Court's ruling on his healthcare law
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| President Obama softened his rhetoric Tuesday about the possibility of a Supreme Court decision striking down his healthcare reform law, after Republicans accused him of “threatening” the high court. (Snip) Obama said Tuesday that he would respect the court’s opinion, but still believes the justices should not overturn the healthcare law. “The point I was making is that the Supreme Court is the final say on our Constitution, and all of us have to respect it,” he said. “But it’s precisely because of that extraordinary power that the court has traditionally exercised significant restraint and deference to a duly elected |
Dems wage pressure campaign on Supreme Court over health ruling
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| Dems wage pressure campaign on Supreme Court over health rulingBy Alexander Bolton - 04/02/12 06:02 PM ET Democrats have waged a not-so-subtle pressure campaign on the Supreme Court in recent days by warning a ruling against the healthcare reform law would smash precedent and threaten popular social programs. President Obama was the latest to weigh in when he declared Monday that a wide array of legal experts would be astonished if the court struck down part or all of his signature domestic initiative. “I’m confident the Supreme Court will uphold the law,” Obama said Monday during a Rose Garden press... |
Obama warns 'unelected' Supreme Court against striking down health law
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| President Obama, employing his strongest language to date on the Supreme Court review of the federal health care overhaul, cautioned the court Monday against overturning the law -- while repeatedly saying he's "confident" it will be upheld. The president spoke at length about the case at a joint press conference with the leaders of Mexico and Canada. The president, adopting what he described as the language of conservatives who fret about judicial activism, questioned how an "unelected group of people" could overturn a law approved by Congress. "I'm confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an... |
Obama warns 'unelected' Supreme Court against striking down health law
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| <p>I think Obama, in his post-summit (Mexico, US, Canada) TV appearance, just told the US Supreme Court how to vote on the Obamacare issue.</p> |
Supreme Court health care debate: If the law fails, what's next? (Big enviro & labor next?)
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| Supreme Court health care debate: If the law fails, what's next?By JOSH GERSTEIN | 4/1/12 7:01 AM EDT The Supreme Court has yet to rule on President Barack Obama’s health care law, but court watchers already are handicapping the domino effect if it falls. If the justices knock out key parts of the law or bring down the whole thing, the reverberations could be felt across the legal landscape for generations to come, radically reining in the scope of federal power, according to supporters of the law and others who closely track the high court. And if the justices decide... |
(hired attack dog) Biden Confident Supreme Court Will Uphold Health Care Law
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| Biden Confident Supreme Court Will Uphold Health Care LawBy Mary Bruce | ABC OTUS News – 23 hrs ago Vice President Joe Biden says he is confident the Supreme Court will uphold the constitutionality of President Obama's signature health care legislation. "We think the mandate and the law is constitutional. And we think the court will rule that way," Biden told CBS News in an interview to be broadcast Sunday on "Face the Nation." **SNIP** Biden, who has assumed the role of the Obama campaign's attack dog, |
Obama lawyer asks Supreme Court to save healthcare law
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| (Reuters) - The Obama administration's top courtroom lawyer made an impassioned plea on Wednesday for the Supreme Court to save President Barack Obama's healthcare law, capping three days of historic arguments that left it unclear how the nine justices would rule. Having peppered the lawyers defending and challenging the law with questions for more than six hours over the three days, the justices withdrew to their chambers to begin up to three months of deliberation expected to yield a decision by late June. Obama's healthcare overhaul, signed into law two years ago, is his signature domestic policy achievement. It remains... |
CAPTION the Commiecare™ freeloaders in front of the Supreme Court building!
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
Commerce and America`s Affordable Health Care Choices Act
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| We are told by certain members of Congress who have voted to pass America`s Affordable Health Care Choice Act that Congress has the authority to enact and enforce the new law under Congress` power to regulate commerce among the States. But is that true? Was the power to regulate commerce among the States intended by our founders to be a grant of power to allow Congress to enter the various States and interfere with the inalienable right of the people to make their own choices and decisions regarding their health care needs? Is this really within the definition of ``commerce``... |
Lis Wiehl while on Neil Cavuto: Necessary and proper clause allows Obamacare
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| On 3/16/2012, while on Neil Cavoto’s show, Lis Wiehl indicated under our Constitution`s necessary and proper clause Congress has almost unlimited powers and the individual mandate would be held constitutional as being necessary and proper legislation. What Lis Wiehl failed to tell Neil is that the clause in question grants no powers to Congress and may only be referred to in reference to a specific power granted to Congress. But let our founding fathers speak for themselves and explain the legislative intent of the following words: The Congress shall have Power … To make all Laws which shall be necessary... |
House votes to overturn Supreme Court decision on eminent domain (Mad Maxine is for it)
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| House votes to overturn Supreme Court decision on eminent domainBy Pete Kasperowicz - 02/28/12 05:19 PM ET The House on Tuesday afternoon approved legislation that overturns a 2005 Supreme Court decision that affirmed the ability of states to take control of private property under the doctrine of eminent domain and hand it to another private developer. That decision, Kelo v. City of New London, led to sharp complaints in particular from Republicans, who argued that the Court ignored the normal "public use" standard. Under that standard, eminent domain was seen as permissible only when the land or property taken would... |
House GOP to renew attacks on health law as Supreme Court hears case
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| House GOP to renew attacks on health law as Supreme Court hears caseBy Julian Pecquet - 02/25/12 06:00 PM ET House Republicans are planning renewed attacks against President Obama's healthcare reform law to coincide with Supreme Court arguments next month. The high court will hear challenges to the law's individual mandate and Medicaid expansion for six hours over three days, starting March 26. House Republicans are planning to ride the renewed focus on the law to chip away at controversial provisions, a leadership aide told The Hill, including its cost-control panel – the Independent Payment Advisory Board, or IPAB –... |
Santorum lied. Spector said he did not promise to back Bush's Supreme Court picks for endorsement.
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| According to today's video interview between CNN's John King and Arlen Spector at the link below, Rick Santorum lied about Arlen Spector's promise to support George Bush's Supreme Court nominees in exchange for Santorum's endorsement, during the nationally televised debate on CNN Wednesday. This is damaging video evidence of Santorum's lie about this important reason given by Santorum for supporting the liberal Arlen Spector over the conservative Patrick Tomey is at the following link. http://www.breitbart.tv/specter-santorum-lied/ During the debate, Romney claimed that if Tomey was elected as the GOP Senator from Pennsylvania instead of Spector, Obamacare would not have passed by... |
Supreme Court to hear Arizona (v. Hussein) immigration arguments April 25
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| Supreme Court to hear Arizona immigration arguments April 25Reuters – Fri, Feb 3, 2012 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court said on Friday it will hear arguments on April 25 on the power of states to adopt tough immigration laws, concluding the term's scheduled oral arguments with a major case pitting Arizona against the Obama administration. The high court released on Friday its April calendar, listing immigration and other cases scheduled to be heard in its final argument sitting for the current term, which began in October and ends in late June. At issue is whether federal immigration laws... |
Occupy protests at Supreme Court, 12 arrested (freeloaders, Citizens United & Super Pacs)
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| Occupy protests at Supreme Court, 12 arrestedBy: Aubrey Whelan | 01/20/12 5:08 PM Examiner Staff Writer Supreme Court Police arrested a dozen Occupy protesters Friday afternoon after they destroyed a police barrier, pushed past a police line and sprinted up the steps of the high court – all in violation of federal law. **SNIP** The protest was organized by the advocacy group Move to Amend, which advocates for a Constitutional amendment that would strike down the Citizens United decision. After a short rally across the street, protesters moved to the Supreme Court building, where police had set up metal barricades.... |
Supreme Court: Discrimination laws do not protect certain employees of religious groups
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| "Justice Clarence Thomas said in a concurring opinion that he would go beyond the majority’s holding and leave up to the church the definition of who is covered by the exception. Civil courts, he said, should “defer to a religious organization’s good-faith understanding of who qualifies as a minister.” Justices Samuel A. Alito Jr. and Elena Kagan wrote separately to make clear that they do not think the term “minister” is central to courts determining who is covered by the exemption. Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Hindus and Buddhists rarely use the title, they wrote. The function performed by the employee is... |
Supreme Court sets aside three days for healthcare arguments (decision before 2014?)
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| Supreme Court sets aside three days for healthcare argumentsBy Sam Baker - 12/19/11 11:40 AM ET The Supreme Court will hear arguments on President Obama's healthcare law over a three-day span in late March. The schedule further confirms the universal expectation that the court will issue a ruling on the healthcare law next June, at the height of the 2012 campaign. The Supreme Court will begin on March 26 with one hour of arguments on whether it can reach a decision on the health law before 2014. There is a possibility that a separate federal law prevents the courts from... |
Senators pushing for Supreme Court to televise arguments on Obama’s health care overhaul
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| Senators pushing for Supreme Court to televise arguments on Obama’s health care overhaulBy Associated Press, Published: December 6 WASHINGTON — Senators are once again pushing the Supreme Court to televise its courtroom proceedings, especially since justices will have an election-year argument over the constitutionality of President Barack Obama’s signature health care overhaul. A Senate Judiciary subcommittee debated Tuesday whether Congress should or — even could — force the Supreme Court, a co-equal branch of government, to allow cameras to broadcast live during arguments. |
Newt Gingrich follows FDR with court-packing scheme
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich’s idea for checking judicial activism is a textbook case of historical revisionism that is strikingly similar to the court-packing scheme of liberal icon Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Gingrich said Congress should just pass a law eliminating specific judgeships, presumably immediately ousting the activist judges currently filling those seats. Gingrich lionizes an incident now regarded as profoundly troubling by constitutional scholars. When Thomas Jefferson replaced John Adams as president in 1801, the outgoing Congress created new federal courts and judgeships which Adams promptly filled. The new Congress repealed the law and the judges were ousted. Jefferson considered... |
ObamaCare Court Case, Supercommittee Woes Linked
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| As the deficit supercommittee continued to flail away Monday with its deadline fast approaching, the Supreme Court took up the constitutionality of the 2010 health law's insurance mandate. The stories dominated national news, but the coverage left out a critical detail: the timing was far from coincidental. Indeed, it seems likely that the parties will have to come to terms over the fate of the Affordable Care Act (aka ObamaCare) before they'll be able to reach a grand deficit bargain. |
Supreme Thomas
Thursday 24th of May 2012 01:15:32 AM
Posted by admin / Under Supreme Tex Mart
| This weekend marks the 20th anniversary of Clarence Thomas’s swearing in on the United States Supreme Court. National Review Online asked some experts, including some former clerks for Thomas, to discuss his record. STEVEN CALABRESI Justice Thomas has had a huge impact on American law during his 20 years on the U.S. Supreme Court. He writes beautiful and well-researched opinions brimming with historical information. Justice Thomas is a consistent originalist who always follows the text of the Constitution wherever it leads. His opinions combine the textualism of Justice Hugo Black with a thorough discussion of the original meaning of the... |
Sponsors
Our Services
Do not forget to check the lastest products and auctions related to Supreme Tex Mart as well as our free videos and podcasts.
Share this!